Position Statement on House No. 3555 and House No. 3705 (Value-added
Tax)
We wish to comment on the
two bills on the Value-added Tax (VAT) passed by
the
House of Representatives.
1. The Foreign Chambers support the increase in the general VAT
rate from 10 to 12% as an essential measure to raise additional public
revenues to avoid a possible crisis.
2. We understand the reason for a lower VAT rate of
6% on seven socially-sensitive products in order to reduce the burden
for the lower-income majority of the population.
3. We support the removal of sectors previously
exempted from VAT, such as medical and legal services and the sale or
importation of electricity and petroleum products.
4. H. B. 3705 applies a VAT on electricity and
petroleum of 4% rising in increments to 12% in four years. This will
add to the cost of doing business and make manufacturing in the
Philippines less regionally competitive. Hence, provisions for relief
should be considered in other legislation to avoid employment layoffs
as the result of higher VAT rates on electricity and petroleum.
5. We strongly oppose two provisions in H. B. 3705
which require the VAT on electricity and petroleum products to be “paid
and absorbed” by the seller of petroleum products and the electricity
generation companies. Such no-pass through language turns the VAT into
a tax on earnings (in addition to corporate income tax), which will
make some of these companies unprofitable and force them to lay off
workers and close operations. Since many are foreign investors, the
country’s foreign investment climate would be gravely harmed and needed
investment in new power plants would be impossible to attract.
6. H. B. 3705 contains language stating that
“Specific provisions in contracts that are contrary to the
implementation of this law are hereby declared null and void.” This
language violates the important sanctity of contracts principle found
both in the Philippine Constitution and international law and is not
acceptable.
7. Should the non-pass through language become law this may
constitute a major breach of contract, activating provisions in
contracts of Independent Power Producers (IPP) with NAPOCOR which could
require NAPOCOR to buy out IPPs, a consequence neither desirable nor
fiscally feasible and which would reverse the power sector
privatization reform under EPIRA.
8. We support the continued exemption from VAT of the sale or
importation of coal and natural gas, both important fuels for power
generation, on the grounds that applying VAT would add to the
already-high cost of electricity.
9. We question the justification for exempting from
VAT passenger and cargo vessels and aircraft including parts, fuel and
supplies. What policy goal is served by favoring these industries over
others which are required to pay the VAT?
10. We are concerned by the provision in Section 4 of
H. B. 3555 (approved in late January) that requires the input tax
credit for VAT paid on capital goods to be equally distributed over
five years. As a sales tax, VAT should be fully creditable in the same
year paid. Unfortunately, the provision of the House Bill means the
private investor will in effect lend the government interest-free funds
by paying the government a VAT sales tax on the purchase of capital
goods but taking five years to recover the amount paid.
RICK
M. SANTOS
RICHARD BARCLAY
President
President
The American Chamber of
Commerce
Australian-New Zealand Chamber
of the Philippines,
Inc.
Commerce of the Philippines, Inc.
STEWART HALL
WILLIAM BAILEY
President
President
Canadian Chamber of Commerce
European Chamber of Commerce
of the Philippines, Inc.
of the Philippines, Inc.
RYUKICHI KAWAGUCHI
ILL KYOUNG PARK
President
President
Japanese Chamber of Commerce
Korean Chamber of Commerce
& Industry of the Philippines, Inc.
of the Philippines, Inc.
SHAMEEM QURASHI
President
Philippine Association of Multinational Companies
Regional Headquarters, Inc.
March 8, 2005